It has me stumped

IT seems more than curious that the female colleague of Tim Paine initially responded agreeably to his 2017 “dick pic” and “lewd messages” as her reply seemingly suggests, only to then complain to Cricket Australia “they were unsolicited” (HS, 20/11).

Was there, I can only ponder, a secret “subtext” in her complaint? Stephen Drill highlights another apparent contradiction in the saga by querying the “integrity” of CA’s processes to “come up with a different result on the same facts three years apart”.

Have I missed some salient revelation or is Tim Paine just a man “stumped by a crazy call?”

All clarifications will be greatly appreciated.